1
General Discussion / Francis Pisani live: innovation and technology
« Last post by kkshaha cnd on September 12, 2023, 06:29:28 am »Heidegger (reading being -for-death ) or reciting the famous syllogism (already in its fateful premise: all men are mortal ), death as a concrete thing does not cross the mind, does not appear as a safe destination; to name it or comment on it or attend the deaths of others, without fully assuming that sooner or later our loved ones will also be affected, without assuming that sooner or later we will be affected. One of the most tiring, or even most overwhelming, aspects of this time of pandemic is the fact that death has taken the form of a constant presence. Neither implicit nor suggested, neither diffuse nor mitigated: each day of this time death is counted and said, death is counted and announced.
The rest, what is not death, seems to be Phone Number List to avoid it, to nullify it or dissuade it, which, although in the negative, does not stop bringing it up. It is not known, but it is assumed, that at some point we will reach what is called "herd immunity." And then that new normal that is being talked about will finally be established.

The corona virus will still be there, but controlled; It will exist like the flu or pneumonia exist today. Some lives will have to be claimed, then, as flu or pneumonia do today; Isolated deaths, drip, without pandemic or flood. What kind of relationship will we establish with these deaths, thus arranged, thinned out and dispersed, when that state of things is finally reached? Will they still move the funeral abacus, so incessant today? Will they be added, one by one, to the public census of deaths? That is, in other words.
Recent Posts






